Based on [current evidence], we recommend [Now AI opportunity] for the next 90 days because [priority, value, and readiness]. 


We recommend [Next AI opportunity] for Next until [advance condition], and [Later AI opportunity] for Later until [review trigger]. 

Leadership must decide whether to approve [priority, owner, investment, and resources]. If approved, [Transformation Leader] will lead Design, Develop, and Operationalize with [Workflow Owner and other contributors], testing [least-proven condition] through [proof point]. 


At Day 90, use [evidence] to recommend whether leadership should advance, reshape, defer, or stop the Now AI opportunity and confirm or change the roadmap.

Using my completed AI Opportunity Sequencing Worksheet, generate four connected outputs: a credible AI opportunity roadmap recommendation, a stakeholder and ownership map, an AI opportunity portfolio tracker covering up to three AI opportunities, and a focused 90-Day Foundation Plan for the Now AI opportunity.

Reuse my business priority, up to three AI opportunities, six qualification signals, four roadmap questions, Now/Next/Later roadmap positions, intended outcome, accountable Transformation Leader, contributing Workflow Owner or workflow-specific ownership gap, least-proven condition, proof point, selected adoption and responsible-scale conditions, contributors, and blockers. Start with a leadership-ready AI opportunity roadmap recommendation explaining why the Now AI opportunity comes first, what must be true before the Next and Later AI opportunities advance, and which investment decision leadership must make. Keep the roadmap recommendation conditional until leadership confirms approval; do not invent an approved owner, investment, or resources.

Build the stakeholder and ownership map, AI opportunity portfolio tracker, and 90-Day Foundation Plan around four plan foundations: AI roadmap; organization-wide adoption; responsible scale; and business value. For each foundation, show what my worksheet establishes, a specific proposed action, the accountable Transformation Leader, contributing role, dependencies or safeguards, evidence or a decision checkpoint, and any missing item marked [TO CONFIRM].

After leadership approves the Now AI opportunity, show a phase-level 90-day plan. Design: confirm the bounded workflow, first users, baseline, accountable roles, required operating conditions, and learning goal. Develop: define the smallest useful delivery approach and the approved confirmation or bounded validation needed for the greatest unknown. Operationalize: plan first-user introduction, manager reinforcement, enablement and support, evidence tracking, and the Day-90 review. Do not invent detailed requirements, integrations, test cases, or rollout commitments unless they are present in the inputs or confirmed by the relevant owner. Phases may overlap.

Distinguish worksheet facts from proposed actions. Keep all three AI opportunities visible in the AI opportunity portfolio tracker; do not treat Next or Later as phases of Now or approved parallel work. Provide a concise [TO CONFIRM] list. Pre-draft the five-point opportunity summary for Now: Priority AI opportunity; Intended outcome; Accountable owner; Evidence needed; and 90-day action. Mark an unconfirmed owner [TO CONFIRM]. The accountable owner is the Transformation Leader driving the approved Now AI opportunity.

Review the generated outputs with the Executive Sponsor, contributing workflow owners, and relevant delivery, governance, and measurement partners. Confirm ownership, permissions, approvals, baselines, safeguards, escalation paths, and resources before treating the plan as approved.

1. Priority AI opportunity: 
2. Intended outcome: 
3. Accountable owner (or ownership gap):
4. Evidence needed: 
5. 90-day action: 

What I’d most value the Champion Network pressure-testing: Name the assumption, readiness gap, or decision where peer input would help.